Tuesday, July 28, 2026

Why are Foreign Banks Leaving India?

Foreign banks are not fully leaving India, but many are scaling back or exiting retail/consumer banking (credit cards, personal loans, mass-market deposits, etc.) while shifting focus to corporate banking, investment banking, trade finance, and wealth management for high-net-worth clients. Some are also entering via stakes in Indian banks instead of building from scratch.

Key Recent Examples

  • Citibank : Sold its entire consumer banking business (including credit cards, retail loans, and wealth management) to Axis Bank in 2023 for about ₹11,600 crore.
  • Deutsche Bank : Selling its India retail banking, private banking, and wealth management business to Kotak Mahindra Bank (deal around mid-2026).
  • Standard Chartered : Sold its personal loan portfolio to Kotak, transferred some credit cards to Federal Bank, and reduced branches (from ~100 to ~80) while focusing more on affluent clients and wealth management.
  • Others (e.g., FirstRand earlier) fully exited or converted to representative offices.

RBI data also noted a slight decline in the number of foreign banks operating via branches or wholly-owned subsidiaries (to 44 as of March 2025).

Main Reasons for the Pullback from Retail

1.     Intense competition from domestic banks Large Indian players (HDFC Bank, ICICI Bank, SBI, Axis, Kotak, etc.) have massive branch networks, deep distribution, low-cost deposit bases, strong digital platforms (boosted by UPI), and scale advantages. Foreign banks typically have only a handful of urban branches (e.g., Citi had ~35, Deutsche ~17), making it hard to compete on pricing, reach, or customer acquisition in mass retail.

2.     Lack of scale and high costs Retail banking is a high-volume, relatively low-margin business. Without national scale, foreign banks face higher funding costs (reliance on wholesale funds instead of cheap retail deposits) and cannot spread compliance, technology, and operating expenses efficiently. This hurts profitability.

3.     Regulatory and compliance burden RBI rules on branch expansion, priority sector lending, capital requirements, data localisation, digital lending norms, and customer protection apply, but smaller foreign bank footprints make these costs disproportionately heavy. Converting to a wholly-owned subsidiary (for easier expansion) has seen limited take-up.

4.     Global strategy shifts Many international banks are restructuring worldwide—exiting consumer banking in multiple markets to focus on higher-return, capital-light businesses like institutional banking, investment banking, and wealth management. India’s retail operations are often small relative to their global balance sheets, making them easier candidates for divestment.

5.     Digital disruption and changed economics India’s digital public infrastructure (UPI, account aggregators, credit bureaus) has levelled the playing field. Domestic banks and fintechs innovate and scale faster with local decision-making, while foreign banks often face slower global approval processes.

What Foreign Banks Are Doing Instead

  • Doubling down on corporate/institutional banking, treasury, trade finance, and cross-border services where their global networks give a clear edge.
  • Targeting affluent/HNI clients for wealth management.
  • Preferring acquisitions or stakes in Indian banks (e.g., Emirates NBD in RBL Bank, SMBC in Yes Bank) rather than organic retail build-outs.
  • Some (like HSBC) are selectively expanding branches in certain cities.

👉In short, this is more a strategic retreat from unprofitable retail segments than a broad exit from India. Domestic banks are the clear beneficiaries, gaining customers, deposits, and scale through these deals, while foreign lenders stick to niches where they have competitive advantages.